The
first video is for all of the farmers. It shows respect towards them, and it
shows how hard farmers work day in and day out. It shows dedication and how
despite their struggles and suffering, they keep pushing through the day and
seasons. The farmers continuously work to provide not only for their family but
for this nation too.
The
second video is mocking the farming industry. It describes how farming once was
the heart of America, but now it has become manufactured and the labor of
immigrants. However, the United States still uses farming as something to be
proud of in our country despite it being about one percent of the population
that is still an actual farmer.
The
second video starts out with the same images and words as the first video, but
the voice that is commentating is more hick, which indicates the mockery. As
the second video progresses, it changes the pictures from the first video of
tractors in a huge field to chickens in a manufacturing building and later on
immigrants in the fields. It also uses graphs and statistics to support their
claims of how farming has transformed from hard labor to machine work. The
first video played off of family and the scenery rather than graphs to support its
message. Based off of these differences, the first video is declaring farmers
as a blessing and special gift from God because of their hard work around the
clock. Whereas the second video is stating that farmers do not exist anymore
because machines have taken over their jobs.
Between
the lines in the second video, it can be said that America has gone downhill
based off of our farming industry. As a society, we have decided to take the
easy way out by the use of our technology. As seen in farming, there are no
long as many hands on the field. A lot of the work is done by machines in big
warehouses or by machines in the fields.
Satire
is used in the second video in order to make the argument larger by decreasing
the worth of farmers. The satire is putting down farmers by making it seem as
if farming is barely existent, and on the rare occasion that there is a farmer,
that farmer does not do much work.
The
strengths of the first video are that it plays on the United States’ pride in
its working ability and praises farmers for their work rather than making fun
of them like is so often seen today. The weakness is that there are not many
who can relate to the video since there are very few farmers left in our
country.
The
strengths of the second video are that it could be interpreted as funny to grab
the audience’s attention, and it used graphs to make the information seem more
reliable. The weakness is that it put farmers down, and since so many Americans
respect farmers, they may disapprove of the message.
No comments:
Post a Comment